<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Reader Duplicate Item Improvement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ifdebug.com/articles/google-reader-duplicate-item-improvement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ifdebug.com/articles/google-reader-duplicate-item-improvement/</link>
	<description>Technical thoughts of a coffee addicted developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair</title>
		<link>http://ifdebug.com/articles/google-reader-duplicate-item-improvement/comment-page-1/#comment-9271</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifdebug.com/articles/google-reader-duplicate-item-improvement/#comment-9271</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll probably find that is being caused by the newspapers amending their articles as more information comes to hand &amp; their CMS automatically publishes to RSS on every amendment. A lot of software these days has the ability to choose to republish the article to RSS on an amendment, as you can imagine it annoys people if they are just fixing a typographical error. 

In your particular example, having Google Reader filter out the duplicates and only showing the most recent version (with a note that it has excluded n other versions which you could see if needed) would be another excellent improvement for the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll probably find that is being caused by the newspapers amending their articles as more information comes to hand &#038; their CMS automatically publishes to RSS on every amendment. A lot of software these days has the ability to choose to republish the article to RSS on an amendment, as you can imagine it annoys people if they are just fixing a typographical error. </p>
<p>In your particular example, having Google Reader filter out the duplicates and only showing the most recent version (with a note that it has excluded n other versions which you could see if needed) would be another excellent improvement for the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://ifdebug.com/articles/google-reader-duplicate-item-improvement/comment-page-1/#comment-9150</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifdebug.com/articles/google-reader-duplicate-item-improvement/#comment-9150</guid>
		<description>I wish Google Reader would do something about the duplicates.  They could start by eliminating duplicates from THE SAME source.  I get so many duplicates from the Detroit News, Detroit Free Press, and Daily Tribune that it makes it almost impossible to keep-up with NEW stuff when so much OLD stuff keeps re-appearing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish Google Reader would do something about the duplicates.  They could start by eliminating duplicates from THE SAME source.  I get so many duplicates from the Detroit News, Detroit Free Press, and Daily Tribune that it makes it almost impossible to keep-up with NEW stuff when so much OLD stuff keeps re-appearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ionel Maries</title>
		<link>http://ifdebug.com/articles/google-reader-duplicate-item-improvement/comment-page-1/#comment-2379</link>
		<dc:creator>Ionel Maries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifdebug.com/articles/google-reader-duplicate-item-improvement/#comment-2379</guid>
		<description>You could try this userscript: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/42498
Very (very) crude but works for most of my dupes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could try this userscript: <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/42498" rel="nofollow">http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/42498</a><br />
Very (very) crude but works for most of my dupes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manu</title>
		<link>http://ifdebug.com/articles/google-reader-duplicate-item-improvement/comment-page-1/#comment-2375</link>
		<dc:creator>manu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifdebug.com/articles/google-reader-duplicate-item-improvement/#comment-2375</guid>
		<description>I would LOVE this feature! I use multiple tracking mechanisms and some come in to my reader and am inundated by duplicate items. If anyone finds a reader which removes duplicates, can u pls let me know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would LOVE this feature! I use multiple tracking mechanisms and some come in to my reader and am inundated by duplicate items. If anyone finds a reader which removes duplicates, can u pls let me know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
