<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Non-English Languages &#038; Whacky Domain Names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ifdebug.com/articles/non-english-languages-whacky-domain-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ifdebug.com/articles/non-english-languages-whacky-domain-names/</link>
	<description>Technical thoughts of a coffee addicted developer</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Holderness</title>
		<link>http://ifdebug.com/articles/non-english-languages-whacky-domain-names/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>James Holderness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 00:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifdebug.com/?p=55#comment-515</guid>
		<description>The algorithm for encoding an international domain name is fairly complicated and is documented in a series of RFCs - 3490, 3491 and 3492. The one that will probably be of most interest to you is RFC 3492, which describes the Punycode encoding format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The algorithm for encoding an international domain name is fairly complicated and is documented in a series of RFCs - 3490, 3491 and 3492. The one that will probably be of most interest to you is RFC 3492, which describes the Punycode encoding format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
